test 1

Social Media

Sunday, July 26, 2026

Men | Sleeveless Jacket - Pieter Lategan

 Archive Number:

PL-FASH-MW-JKT-2026-0704-001

Pattern Number:

PL-M-001-PAT1

Front view of a men's sleeveless jacket prototype during the pattern construction stage by Pieter Lategan. The garment is mounted on a dress form while the pattern and construction are being refined. Pattern Number: PL-M-001-PAT1.

Front Construction View - Men's Sleeveless Jacket Prototype

Side view of a men's sleeveless jacket prototype during the pattern construction stage by Pieter Lategan. The garment is fitted on a dress form to evaluate the side profile, armhole shaping, seam placement, and overall construction. Pattern Number: PL-M-001-PAT1.

Side Construction View - Men's Sleeveless Jacket Prototype

Rear view of a men's sleeveless jacket prototype during the pattern construction stage by Pieter Lategan. The garment is displayed on a dress form to evaluate the back panel, shoulder alignment, seam placement, and overall garment balance. Pattern Number: PL-M-001-PAT1.

Rear Profile - Men's Sleeveless Jacket Pattern Construction


Collar prototype for a men's sleeveless jacket during the pattern construction stage by Pieter Lategan. The collar components are clipped together to evaluate shape, length, seam alignment, and construction before being attached to the garment. Pattern Number: PL-M-001-PAT1.

Collar Construction Detail - Men's Sleeveless Jacket Prototype

Complete three-piece pattern for the inner construction of a men's sleeveless jacket prototype by Pieter Lategan. The pattern includes the left front panel, right back panel, and collar pattern, prepared for prototype construction. Pattern Number: PL-M-001-PAT1.

Complete Pattern Layout - Men's Sleeveless Jacket Prototype


Handwritten fashion sketchbook page P204 by Pieter Lategan documenting the pattern development of a men's sleeveless jacket prototype. The notes describe design revisions, including removing the separate collar, modifying the lower hem, and using the fabric as the inner facing of the jacket. Pattern Number: PL-M-001-PAT1.

Handwritten Design Notes - Men's Sleeveless Jacket Pattern Development | P204

Pattern Development Update | Page 204

During this construction stage, I made several improvements before producing the final version.

The original pattern for the men's sleeveless jacket included a separate collar. After further evaluation, I decided to remove the collar because the fabric shown here will instead be used as the inside facing of the jacket. This inner facing will also provide additional support and structure to the garment.

I also decided to modify the lower edge of the pattern. The original design featured a rounded hem, but I have recut the pattern with a straight bottom edge to create a cleaner, more structured finish.

The photographs below document these design changes, showing the revised prototype pattern together with the fabric that will be used for the inside of the men's sleeveless jacket.

These changes form part of the ongoing development process before the final pattern and garment construction are completed.

Pattern Development Update

Pieter Lategan

26 July 2026 - 18:44 PM

Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa

Handwritten fashion sketchbook page P205 by Pieter Lategan documenting the continued pattern development of a men's sleeveless jacket prototype. The notes record the pattern number and confirm that the latest design changes are part of the ongoing garment development before the final pattern and construction are completed. Pattern Number: PL-M-001-PAT1.

Handwritten Design Notes — Men's Sleeveless Jacket Pattern Development | P205

Pattern Development Update | Page 205

Pattern Number

PL-M-001-PAT1

These design changes form part of the ongoing development of the garment before the final pattern and construction are completed.

Pieter Lategan

26 July 2026 - 18:55 PM

Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa


Front view of the inner facing for a men's sleeveless jacket prototype by Pieter Lategan. The inside facing has been constructed and fitted to a dress form to evaluate the neckline, front opening, shoulder shaping, and overall fit before being attached to the outer jacket. Pattern Number: PL-M-001-PAT1.

Front Interior Construction - Men's Sleeveless Jacket

Side view of the inner facing for a men's sleeveless jacket prototype by Pieter Lategan. The inner facing is fitted to a dress form to evaluate the side profile, shoulder line, armhole shaping, and overall garment construction before being permanently attached to the outer jacket. Pattern Number: PL-M-001-PAT1.

Pieter Lategan | FASHION - Men's Sleeveless Jacket | Side Inner Facing View | PL-M-001-PAT1

Rear view of the inner facing for a men's sleeveless jacket prototype by Pieter Lategan. The inner facing is fitted to a dress form to evaluate the back panel, shoulder alignment, neckline, and overall garment construction before being permanently attached to the outer jacket. Pattern Number: PL-M-001-PAT1.

Rear Inner Facing View - Men's Sleeveless Jacket Prototype

Continue Exploring This Jacket Study

Read the Men's Sleeveless Canvas Zip Jacket Concept Study | click here

Read the Men's Jacket Development and Prototype Pattern Fitting Study | click here

Read the Men's Sleeveless Jacket Pattern Construction and Inner Facing Study | You are here

Tuesday, July 21, 2026

Subtractive Silent Monumentalism - Notes, Sketches and the Discipline of Removal


Photograph of handwritten sketchbook page 191 by Pieter Lategan outlining Subtractive Silent Monumentalism through mass, silence, space, controlled removal, weight and presence.

Meaning Through Removal - Subtractive Silent Monumentalism | Page 191

Subtractive Silent Monumentalism

Silent Monumentalism consists of:

  • Mass
  • Silence
  • Space

These elements connect with subtractive principles.

Both approaches are less concerned with decoration and more concerned with mass, silence and space.

Both reduce excessive decoration through the deliberate omission of what is unnecessary.

Everything that does not serve the core is removed. This allows mass and silence to carry weight and presence.

What remains becomes the true content of the work rather than decoration.

What remains is mass, silence, weight and presence. These elements carry meaning without excessive additions.

Meaning is created by taking away, not by adding.

Pieter Lategan
20 July 2026 - 01:39 PM
Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa

Photograph of handwritten sketchbook page 192 by Pieter Lategan discussing Subtractive Silent Monumentalism, historical references such as God’s Finger in Namibia and the Kailasa Temple in India, and the principle that detail must support the core.

Subtractive Silent Monumentalism - Mass, Silence, Space and the Role of Detail | Page 192

Subtractive Silent Monumentalism

I look at historical monuments, places and sculptures, and at examples such as God’s Finger in Namibia and the Kailasa Temple in India.

These references help me formulate my thoughts and help me understand mass, silence and space in context by studying historical places and then applying those ideas in my own work.

Detail can either support or overpower.

Detail must support the core.

The viewer’s eye must first rest on mass, weight, presence and silence, and not on detail.

We are speaking here about Subtractive Silent Monumentalism, not Subtractive Gravitas.

Pieter Lategan
20 July 2026  02:00 AM
Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa

Photograph of handwritten sketchbook page 193 by Pieter Lategan describing Subtractive Silent Monumentalism, the idea that silence is a conscious choice, and the role of light, shadow and calmness in the work.

Subtractive Silent Monumentalism - Quietness, Light and Conscious Silence | Page 193

Subtractive Silent Monumentalism

Subtractive Silent Monumentalism seeks to make quietness visible.

The aim is to show calmness through Silent Monumentalism.

What is removed is often detail.

The viewer should enter the space slowly.

The work can be explained briefly so that viewers first feel and then judge.

The viewer sees what remains, and notices how light and shadow shape the experience.

Silence is not empty. It is a conscious choice.

Silence carries meaning.
- Pieter Lategan, 2026

Page 22 shows the initial mass as one solid form. It appears anchored. This is not final. It is the beginning of my thought process.

Hand-drawn graphite sketch from Pieter Lategan’s sketchbook, Page 22, showing a heavy monolithic form divided by a deep central void, exploring mass, negative space, weight and grounded presence within Subtractive Silent Monumentalism.

Subtractive Silent Monumentalism - Mass, Void and Grounded Presence | Page 22

Pieter Lategan
20 July 2026 - 02:31 AM
Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa

Photograph of handwritten sketchbook page 194 by Pieter Lategan explaining how Subtractive Silent Monumentalism uses deliberate removal, negative space, silence and reduced detail to create stronger presence and visual weight.

Subtractive Silent Monumentalism - Removal, Silence and Presence | Page 194

Subtractive Silent Monumentalism

Page 22 is the initial study of how to make the form quieter.

The aim is to remove deliberately and to make the work stiller and calmer:

  • less tension
  • less distraction
  • more space for breathing
  • less detail

What remains gains more visual weight.

You remove so that what remains becomes stronger in presence, and so that the viewer’s focus is directed toward the relationship between mass and silence.

Why do I remove?

  • because emptiness is a carrier of meaning
  • in other words, the negative space begins to speak actively

What do I want to say?

The negative space becomes an active part of the composition.

In other words, the removal becomes silence, and I do not need to replace it with something else.

Pieter Lategan
20 July 2026 - 19:10 PM
Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa

Photograph of handwritten sketchbook page 195 by Pieter Lategan explaining how deliberate removal creates silence and changes the relationship between mass, space, light and negative space within Subtractive Silent Monumentalism.

Subtractive Silent Monumentalism - Deliberate Removal and Active Space | Page 195

Subtractive Silent Monumentalism

Why do I remove?

I remove because it lies at the core of my philosophy of Silent Monumentalism.

I leave unnecessary decoration behind.

What happens when I remove?

Silence is created deliberately. My work can then carry silence.

I want to create silence within the noise—a space where the viewer can look more slowly and think.

Philosophy

Silent Monumentalism examines how deliberate removal changes the relationship between mass and space in order to create silence.

Page 22

Page 22 now focuses on the full, raw mass.

In this study, negative space organises the form. The space determines the silhouettes and boundaries of the forms.

Formulating a Method

The method is developed through deliberate removal.

This changes the relationship between mass, space and light.

Negative space is no longer merely the background. It becomes an active part of the composition.

Pieter Lategan
21 July 2026 - 15:21 PM
Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa

Photograph of handwritten sketchbook page 196 by Pieter Lategan connecting Subtractive Silent Monumentalism with the discipline of logo design, deliberate omission, negative space, silence and communicating a clear central meaning.

Subtractive Silent Monumentalism - Notes, Sketches and the Discipline of Removal

Subtractive Silent Monumentalism

Negative space and silence contribute to the structure of the work.

Silence becomes deliberate. It creates room for meaning and gives the viewer time to look first and then to think.

The purpose of Silent Monumentalism is to leave things out deliberately—to create space and silence so that meaning can emerge.

A Comparison with Logo Design

This is a comparison drawn from my own experience.

I worked with logo design for many years. It taught me the discipline of using fewer visual elements to communicate the core, message or meaning of a logo quickly and clearly.

The discipline is to use fewer visual components so that the core can stand out more clearly.

This principle will remain relevant: remove what is unnecessary so that the core becomes clear.

Even as technology changes, the human ability to observe, judge and distinguish between what is necessary and what can be left out remains important.

Pieter Lategan
21 July 2026 - 15:29 PM
Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa

Photograph of handwritten sketchbook page 197 by Pieter Lategan discussing the continuing importance of human observation and choice despite changing technology, followed by an analysis of mass, silence, space and three-dimensional form in Sketchbook Page 23.

Subtractive Silent Monumentalism - Human Observation and Choice | Page 197

Subtractive Silent Monumentalism

Regardless of changes in technology and tools, human observation and choice remain important.

Human judgement and the ability to choose remain central, even as technology and equipment continue to change.

There must still be decisions about:

  • what should be left out;
  • what should be improved;
  • and what is necessary for the work.

As a person practises and reflects, the work gradually improves.

Page 23

Hand-drawn graphite sketch from Pieter Lategan’s sketchbook, Page 23, showing heavy angular masses surrounding an open central space and exploring silence, weight, negative space and grounded presence.

Subtractive Silent Monumentalism - Excavated Spatial Study | Page 23

The eye moves towards the open space.

The mass feels calm and anchored.

Detail remains secondary.

Conceptually, the forms appear as blocks and spatial volumes. They do not represent a specific place. Instead, the viewer experiences:

  • space;
  • silence;
  • weight;
  • and mass.

The three-dimensional quality is clearly visible.

Silence, mass and space are also clearly present.

The form appears to stand on something. The shadow helps it appear grounded rather than suspended.

Pieter Lategan
21 July 2026 - 15:37 PM
Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa

Photograph of handwritten sketchbook page 198 by Pieter Lategan analysing Page 24 of the Subtractive Silent Monumentalism study through control, stability, simplification, tension between masses, negative space, direction and monumentality.

Subtractive Silent Monumentalism - Page 24 Analysis | Page 198

Subtractive Silent Monumentalism

Page 24

Silent Monumentalism must have control.

It must show a clear relationship between silence and mass.

This is a spatial study that uses mass and silence as its main subjects.

Through deliberate omission, the focus shifts more clearly toward the relationship between mass, silence and space.

The aim of subtraction is not simply to show less, but to make the relationship between silence, mass and weight clearer.

Observations on Page 24

Hand-drawn graphite sketch from Pieter Lategan’s sketchbook, Page 24, showing simplified monumental forms separated by an angular opening, exploring spatial tension, mass, silence and negative space.

Subtractive Silent Monumentalism - Spatial Tension Study | Page 24


  1. Stability
    The forms appear stable and grounded. This strengthens Silent Monumentalism because stability creates a sense of stillness, weight and presence.
  2. Simplification
    Simplification is the deliberate removal of unnecessary elements. It makes the relationship between mass, silence and space clearer.
  3. Tension between the masses
    The opening between the forms creates tension. The negative space is not empty; it actively separates and connects the masses at the same time.
  4. Direction
    The negative space leads the eye through the composition. It guides the viewer’s movement between the forms.
  5. Control of form, line and space
    The composition shows control through simple forms, limited lines and clear relationships. This creates a feeling of order, silence and monumentality.
  6. Mass and space in relation
    This study examines how mass and space stand in relation to one another. The space is not empty; it carries tension and meaning.

Pieter Lategan
21 July 2026 - 15:41 PM
Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa

Photograph of handwritten sketchbook page 199 by Pieter Lategan analysing Sketchbook Page 25 and explaining how reduced mass, weaker negative space and excessive simplification can weaken monumental weight and presence.

Subtractive Silent Monumentalism - Page 25 and the Loss of Monumental Weight | Page 199

Subtractive Silent Monumentalism

Sketchbook Page 25

  • The mass has decreased.
  • The lines make the sketch feel lighter.
  • The opening is weaker.
  • Lines and planes begin to take over, causing the sketch to lose some of its weight and monumental presence.
  • In this study, the qualities of Silent Monumentalism are expressed less strongly.
  • Too much simplification can weaken Silent Monumentalism.

Conclusion

From these first studies of Silent Monumentalism, it appears that monumentality does not arise from mass alone. It develops through the relationship between mass, space and negative space.

The sketches reveal a method of observation.

Page 25 shows where the balance begins to shift away from mass.

Hand-drawn graphite sketch from Pieter Lategan’s sketchbook, Page 25, showing lightly defined angular planes and reduced architectural mass within a developing Subtractive Silent Monumentalism study.

Subtractive Silent Monumentalism - Reduced Mass Study | Page 25

The central question becomes:

How does form carry meaning?

Pieter Lategan
21 July 2026 - 16:51 PM
Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa

Photograph of handwritten sketchbook page 200 by Pieter Lategan explaining how Subtractive Silent Monumentalism creates meaning through deliberate removal and the controlled relationship between mass, silence and space.

Subtractive Silent Monumentalism - Developing Meaning Through Removal | Page 200
Go to Notes | click here

Photograph of handwritten sketchbook page 201 by Pieter Lategan discussing logo design, visual reduction, human judgement and the development of Subtractive Silent Monumentalism through Pages 22 to 25.

Subtractive Silent Monumentalism - From Grounded Mass to Simplification | Page 201
Go to Notes | click here

Photograph of handwritten sketchbook page 202 by Pieter Lategan concluding that monumentality develops through the controlled relationship between mass, space, silence, negative space and weight.

Subtractive Silent Monumentalism - Minimum Form, Maximum Presence | Page 202
Go to Notes | click here

Continue Exploring This Study

Read the Subtractive Silent Monumentalism Notes and Sketches | You are here

Read the Kailasa Temple Architectural Notes and Subtractive Studies | click here

Continue the Discussion

Start with one detail. What do you notice first about the relationship between mass, negative space and silence in these studies?

Which sketch carries the strongest monumental presence, and where does simplification begin to reduce its weight or stability?

What should be removed—and what must remain—for a form to carry meaning?

Share your observation or question in the comments. I read the discussion and use recurring questions to guide future studies.

Friday, July 17, 2026

Kailasa Temple at Ellora | Handwritten Architectural Notes and Subtractive Studies

 

Kailasa Temple at Ellora - Research, Sketches and Architectural Development

Kailasa Temple - Handwritten Architecture Notes | Page 177

Kailasa Temple

Also known as the Kailasanath Temple, Cave 16 at the Ellora Caves in Maharashtra, India.

Hindu tradition

  • It was cut out of a basalt cliff.
  • It has been described as the world’s largest single monolithic excavation.
  • It was not constructed with blocks, but carved out of a cliff.
  • Sculpted.

Date

The main construction was built during the late 8th century CE.

757–783 CE, attributed to the Rashtrakuta ruler Krishna I.

There are no records of the building process.

The main structure appears to belong to Krishna I’s period.

Some sculptures, paintings, repairs, and additions may have been completed under later rulers.

Architectural
Pieter Lategan
12 July 2026 - 01:21 AM
Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa

Photograph of handwritten sketchbook page 178 by Pieter Lategan containing English research notes about the Kailasa Temple at Ellora, its late eighth-century development and its creation through subtractive architecture.

Kailasa Temple - Subtractive Architecture Notes | Page 178

Kailasa Temple / India

The wider Hindu section at Ellora developed over a longer period, roughly between the 7th and 10th centuries CE.

It is safe to say, then, that it was created in the late eighth century, rather than claiming that it was finished during one short reign.

This monument was excavated, not constructed.

What is important is that it was not built stone upon stone, but by using an architectural style called subtractive architecture. Kailasa emerged downwards, and material was taken away. This building style is called subtractive architecture.

Normal building style is upwards, not downwards.

Architectural
Pieter Lategan
12 June 2026 - 7:56 AM
Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa

Photograph of handwritten sketchbook page 179 by Pieter Lategan explaining how the Kailasa Temple at Ellora was carved from fine-grained basalt and isolated from the surrounding cliff by deep trenches.

How the Kailasa Temple Was Carved - Basalt and Trenches | Page 179

Kailasa Temple

How the Temple Was Carved

Builders selected suitable basalt

Ellora lies in a volcanic rock formation known as the Deccan Traps. They selected fine-grained basalt that could be carved accurately. They also studied natural horizontal and vertical joints in the rock that helped split and remove material more efficiently.

Trenches

Three enormous trenches isolated the temple block.

Stoneworkers cut deep trenches into the hill around three sides of a planned rectangular mass. This separated the future temple from the surrounding cliff and created the open courtyard around it.

Architecture | Sculptures
Pieter Lategan
12 July 2026 - 9:03 AM
Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa


Photograph of handwritten sketchbook page 180 by Pieter Lategan explaining how the Kailasa Temple at Ellora was carved from top to bottom, allowing rubble removal, protected sculpture work and the temporary use of rock as working platforms.

Kailasa Temple - The Top-Down Carving Process | Page 180

Kailasa Temple

Work was done from top to bottom. That is how it became a freestanding building.

The roof was formed first, followed by the tower, walls, halls and sculptural details.

The top-down process had its advantages

  • Rubble fell into areas that had not yet received their final carving.
  • Finished areas and sculptures were less likely to be damaged by later excavation above them.
  • Builders could temporarily retain large masses of rock as working platforms.
  • The building remained connected to the mountain while its major form was established.

Teams most probably worked on different areas at the same time.

Architecture / Sculptures / Art / Subtractive Architecture
Pieter Lategan
12 July 2026 — 9:25 AM
Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa

Photograph of handwritten sketchbook page 181 by Pieter Lategan describing the simultaneous carving of different areas of the Kailasa Temple, the specialist sculptors who refined its surfaces and its resemblance to a constructed South Indian temple.

What Makes the Kailasa Temple Design Extraordinary | Page 181

Kailasa Temple

At the same time, they worked on or in the main shrine, gateway and courtyard walls. So it was possible to work on the floor and on the roof at the same time.

Although many elements appear to be independent buildings, they remain part of the original rock formation.

Sculptors Completed the Surfaces

Specialised workers could refine the surfaces. Chisel traditions at Ellora were highly developed, with separate stages likely involving rough excavation, architectural shaping, figure carving, surface finishing and painting. Traces of paintings still survive in portions of the temple.

What Makes the Design Extraordinary

Kailasa reproduces the appearance of a constructed South Indian temple, even though it was carved out of the mountain.

Pieter Lategan
12 July 2026 - 9:55 AM
Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa

Photograph of handwritten sketchbook page 183 by Pieter Lategan describing the architectural forms of the Kailasa Temple, its South Indian Pallava and Chalukya influences, and the mystery of its precise three-dimensional planning and measurement system.

Kailasa Indian Temple - Architectural Design and Traditions | Page 183

Kailasa Indian Temple

This temple contains architectural forms that are normally built separately. These include columns, beams, roofs, pavilions, stairways, gateways and temple towers. Stone columns appear to support roofs, but structurally they are continuous with the rock from which the entire complex was carved.

The design of the Kailasa Temple reflects established South Indian traditions, especially architectural ideas associated with Pallava and Chalukya monuments.

This was an attempt to reproduce a complete structural temple complex through excavation.

What Are the Genuine Mysteries?

The exact planning and measurement system.

The builders required an extremely accurate three-dimensional plan before...

Pieter Lategan
13 July 2026 - 14:27 PM
Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa

Photograph of handwritten sketchbook page 184 by Pieter Lategan describing the precise planning methods required to excavate the Kailasa Temple, including its central axis, depth, symmetry, internal halls and the later tradition identifying the architect as Kokasa.

Kailasa Temple - Planning, Measurement and Excavation | Page 184

Kailasa Temple / India

Removing major sections of rock.

If a stone was removed accidentally, it could not be replaced.

They needed reliable methods for:

  • Setting out the central axis.
  • Calculating the depth of excavation.
  • Maintaining symmetry while working downward.
  • Positioning internal halls beneath completed upper forms.
  • Coordinating several groups of workers.
  • Allowing for differences and fractures within the basalt.

The general principles of Indian temple geometry and stonework are understood, but no complete Kailasa blueprint or technical manual has survived.

The Identity of the Architect

A later tradition names an architect called Kokasa and tells a story in which the temple was begun from the top so that the queen could quickly see the tower and stop fasting.

Pieter Lategan
13 July 2026 — 15:36 PM
Pretoria, Gauteng, Pretoria

Photograph of handwritten sketchbook page 189 by Pieter Lategan discussing how the Kailasa Temple required master planners, surveyors, quarry workers, stonecutters, sculptors, painters, labourers and supervisors, and how it belongs to India’s long tradition of rock-cut architecture.

Kailasa Temple - How the Labour Was Organised | Page 189

Kailasa Indian Temple

The story may preserve memories of a real architectural tradition, but it was recorded centuries after the temple’s principal construction. It cannot be treated as direct eighth-century documentation.

How the Labour Was Organised

A monument of this complexity required far more than one brilliant architect. It would have involved master planners, surveyors, quarry workers, stonecutters, architectural sculptors, figure sculptors, painters, labourers and supervisors.

We do not know whether these teams were divided, paid, trained or scheduled.

Kailasa belongs to a long and well-documented Indian tradition of rock-cut architecture.

Ellora contains Buddhist, Hindu and Jain excavations produced over several centuries.

The remarkable achievements came from accumulated knowledge, skilled organisation, careful surveying and generations of experience.

Pieter Lategan
17 July 2026 — 21:09
Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa

Photograph of handwritten sketchbook page 190 by Pieter Lategan describing the Kailasa Temple as both architecture and sculpture, formed from one continuous rock mass through the removal of material and the creation of meaningful empty space.

Kailasa Temple - Temple, Sculpture and Empty Space | Page 190

Kailasa Indian Temple in India

Stoneworkers — not from unexplained techniques

The Strongest Architectural Interpretation

Kailasa is both temple and sculpture.

A constructed temple is assembled from many individual parts. Kailasa was conceived as one continuous mass, with courtyards, columns, figures, halls and empty spaces produced through removal.

Its architecture is therefore not only the stone that remains. Empty space surrounding and passing through the stone is equally important. The builders effectively transformed a mountain into an inhabitable image of another sacred mountain. UNESCO describes it as the culmination of Indian rock-cut architecture and an exceptional technological and artistic achievement.

Share your observation or question in the comments. I read the discussion and use recurring questions to guide future studies.


Pieter Lategan
17 July 2026 - 21:20 PM
Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa

Continue Exploring This Study

Read the Kailasa Temple Architectural Notes and Subtractive Studies | You are here

Read the Subtractive Silent Monumentalism Notes and Sketches | click here

Read the Main Architectural Article | click here

Continue the Discussion

Start with one detail. What do you notice first about the relationship between solid rock, carved void and human scale?

What does the Kailasa Temple teach us about architecture created by removing material rather than adding it?

Sunday, July 12, 2026

Kailasa Temple at Ellora | Architecture Carved from a Mountain

 






The Kailasa Temple, Ellora Caves, India. Photo by N M Kowlagi, via Wikimedia Commons, licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.

Photo: N M Kowlagi
Date taken: 8 March 2015
Source: Wikimedia Commons – DSC05800 Ellora Caves Aurangabad, India
Licence: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International, also known as CC BY-SA 4.0.

Continue Exploring This Study

Read the Main Architectural Article | You are here

Read the Handwritten Notes and Subtractive Studies | click here

Friday, July 10, 2026

Men | Jacket Development - Prototype Pattern Fitting Study

Developing the Sleeveless Jacket Through Pattern Testing

Archive Number:
PL-FASH-MW-JKT-2026-0704-001

Pattern Number:

PL-M-001-PAT1 

Size:
Large (Made for Pieter Lategan)

Location:
Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa

Date:
10 July 2026

This post documents the next stage in the development of my sleeveless men's jacket.

Rather than producing the final garment immediately, I first construct a complete prototype using inexpensive test fabric. This allows me to study the balance of the garment, seam positions, neckline, shoulder width, body length and overall proportions before cutting the final fabric.

The floral fabric shown here is used purely for development purposes. The print itself is not part of the intended final design. It provides an economical way to test the pattern and identify adjustments that may improve the fit and construction.

Working directly on the dress form allows me to evaluate the garment from every angle and make careful decisions before beginning the finished version.

This documentation forms part of my ongoing fashion sketchbook, recording the complete design process from concept through prototype and eventually to the completed garment.

Every stage is archived as part of the Pieter Lategan | STUDIO documentation system so that the development history of each design remains permanently recorded.

Front view of a sleeveless men's jacket prototype during the pattern testing stage by Pieter Lategan. Test fabric demonstrates construction lines, neckline and front opening before final production. Archive Number PL-FASH-MW-JKT-2026-0704-001.

Front Prototype Opening - Pattern Development

Side view of a sleeveless men's jacket prototype by Pieter Lategan showing pattern development and three-dimensional garment construction on a tailor's mannequin. Floral test fabric used for evaluating fit and silhouette. Archive Number PL-FASH-MW-JKT-2026-0704-001.

Side Profile - Pattern Fitting Evaluation

Prototype sleeveless men's jacket viewed from the back during pattern development by fashion designer Pieter Lategan. Floral test fabric mounted on a dress form to evaluate fit, seam placement and garment proportions. Archive Number PL-FASH-MW-JKT-2026-0704-001.

Rear Prototype View - Pattern Development Study

Handwritten fashion sketchbook page P174 by Pieter Lategan documenting the prototype pattern fitting study for a sleeveless men's jacket, including archive number, pattern number and construction development notes.

Men | Sleeveless Jacket Prototype - Design Development Notes (P174)

Men's Jacket Development

Prototype Pattern Fitting Study

Archive Number
PL-FASH-MW-JKT-2026-0704-001

Pattern Number
PL-M-001-PAT1

This next stage documents the development of my sleeveless men's jacket.

I first construct a complete prototype using inexpensive test fabric. This allows me to study the balance of the garment, seam positions, neckline, shoulder width, body length and overall proportions before cutting the final fabric.

The floral fabric is used only for development purposes. The print is not part of the final design. It provides an economical way to test the pattern and identify adjustments that may improve the fit and construction.

Fashion

Pieter Lategan

10 July 2026 - 14:21 PM

Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa

Handwritten fashion sketchbook page P175 by Pieter Lategan describing the prototype development process for a sleeveless men's jacket and documenting the garment as part of the studio archive.

Men | Sleeveless Jacket Prototype - Development Notes (P175)

Men's Jacket Development

Working directly on the garment allows me to evaluate the fit from every angle and make careful decisions before beginning the finished jacket.

This document forms part of my ongoing fashion sketchbook, recording the complete development process from concept to the final garment.

Every stage is permanently archived as part of my studio documentation system, ensuring that each garment's development history is fully recorded.

Men's Fashion

Pieter Lategan

10 July 2026 — 14:30 PM

Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa

Continue Exploring This Jacket Study

Read the Men's Sleeveless Canvas Zip Jacket Concept Study | click here

Read the Men's Jacket Development and Prototype Pattern Fitting Study | You are here

Read the Men's Sleeveless Jacket Pattern Construction and Inner Facing Study | click here


@cinemabymb Rest in power to BONNIE TYLER 🎙️🎥 #bonnietyler #holdingoutforahero #footloose #cinema #soundtrack ♬ original sound - cinemabymb